Trimtabist

The US Trade Ledger — every US container gateway, every partner country, every month — verified against real ship movements.

← the board · Engagement 06

“Did the Red Sea crisis reroute American imports?”

asked by Mrigank Singh · re-verified 2026-08-07

The number it created

No. The East + Gulf Coast share of gateway imports held 56–59%, flat through the entire disruption window. The null is published with the same prominence as any hit.

61 31 2023-06: 58 % East+Gulf2023-07: 61 % East+Gulf2023-08: 57 % East+Gulf2023-09: 56 % East+Gulf2023-10: 60 % East+Gulf2023-11: 56 % East+Gulf2023-12: 58 % East+Gulf2024-01: 56 % East+Gulf2024-02: 59 % East+Gulf2024-03: 59 % East+Gulf2024-04: 58 % East+Gulf2024-05: 60 % East+Gulf2024-06: 56 % East+Gulf 56 2023-062023-122024-06
East + Gulf share of US gateway imports through the Red Sea window. The line does not move.

What it does not say

It does not say the crisis was costless — rates and transit times are outside this test. It says tonnage did not move between coasts. · the full record

Run it yourself

With the ledger connected to your own AI, paste:

Using the Trimtab event_studies tool, what did the Red Sea study find about US coast shares — and why is publishing a null result valuable?

Share it

“Did the Red Sea crisis reroute American imports?”
No. The East + Gulf Coast share of gateway imports held 56–59%, flat through the entire disruption window. The null is published with the same prominence as any hit.
It does not say the crisis was costless — rates and transit times are outside this test. It says tonnage did not move between coasts.
I asked the Trimtab US Trade Ledger — open, no key, no account. Ask it something we haven’t: https://trimtabist.com/asked/red-sea
(via Mrigank Singh — engagement 06 on the board) #Trimtabist
Share on WhatsApp

This address is permanent. If the number is ever revised, the revision is printed here with its reason.