What does this code pay?
Type the code and the origin. You get what the schedule required on that line — read at the entry’s own month, with the Chapter 99 arithmetic shown — and what US importers were actually charged on it at the border. Where the rule cannot be settled from the public record, the page says so and names why.
| what | subject | counted by | at this resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| you typed | 8471.30.01.00 | — | 35.00% required |
| the schedule | 8471.30.01.00 | the tariff schedule · 1 line | this line, on its own |
| what was charged | 8471.30.01.00 | US Census receipts · nationwide · every mode | 15.36% · June 2026 |
| what shipped | 8471.30.__.__ | US Census port records · 11 seaports | $97.5m · 1,537 t · $33.62/kg typical month · May 2026 |
- Code
- 8471.30.01.00 · Automatic data processing machines and units thereof; magnetic or optical readers, machines for transcribing data onto data media in coded form and machines for processing such data, not elsewhere specified or included › Portable automatic data processing machines, weighing not more than 10 kg, consisting of at least a central processing unit, a keyboard and a display
- Origin
- China
- Column 1 General, as printed
- Free — the ordinary base rate, before any trade-war measure · 2026HTSRev18
- What the schedule required
- 35.00% in June 2026
- What was actually paid
- 15.36% on 8471.30.01.00 in June 2026 — every importer on that line, nationwide
Duty assessed at entry ÷ dutiable value, counted by US Census across every importer on this code and origin. January 2017 to June 2026.
What was required
Built by us from the 2026HTSRev18 schedule and the Chapter 99 measures in force in that month. Nobody observed it — we built it by reading the rules.
How that rate is built
Each term read at the entry’s own month, not today’s.
| Column 1 General rate | 0.00% | in force |
| Section 232 | 0.00% | in force |
| Section 301 | 25.00% | in force |
| IEEPA | 0.00% | struck February 2026 |
| Country measure, Chapter 99 | 0.00% | struck February 2026 |
| Section 122 | 10.00% | contested — on hold |
| The schedule required | 35.00% |
The third column is each layer’s standing, not its size. These are separate laws at different stages: the IEEPA provisions were struck down and duty under them is refundable with interest; Section 122 was held unlawful by a federal court and that ruling is stayed on appeal, so it is unsettled; Section 232, Section 301 and the general column are in force. A layer at 0.00% still has a standing, and which law a duty was filed under is what decides whether anything can be done about it.
Country measure, source: Proc. 11012 (9903.03.01).
| 8471.30.01.00 · China · June 2026 | rate |
|---|---|
| The schedule required | 35.00% |
| Duty assessed at entry, nationwide | 15.36% |
| The difference | −19.64 percentage points |
What was paid on 8471.30 from China
Six digits — one level up from the line above. Not because that is where the count is published: these receipts are held at ten digits, and the line above is one of them. It is because a heading is a steadier denominator than a single line, and 8471.30.01.00 is 100.0% of this one — a monthly rate on a small base moves on a handful of shipments. Every importer on this heading and origin, month by month, nationwide and across every mode of transport, as counted by US Census. Last 24 months.
| month | imported for consumption | dutiable value | duty assessed | rate on the dutiable part |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06 | $585.2m | $4.3m | $660k | 15.36% |
| 2026-05 | $442.4m | $5.6m | $814k | 14.53% |
| 2026-04 | $316.5m | $4.4m | $701k | 15.88% |
| 2026-03 | $124.7m | $4.5m | $873k | 19.56% |
| 2026-02 | $73.0m | $43.2m | $5.6m | 12.87% |
| 2026-01 | $74.7m | $55.6m | $6.6m | 11.88% |
| 2025-12 | $89.4m | $67.1m | $8.5m | 12.71% |
| 2025-11 | $74.0m | $63.5m | $9.5m | 14.95% |
| 2025-10 | $103.5m | $83.2m | $17.5m | 20.98% |
| 2025-09 | $157.3m | $132.8m | $27.3m | 20.56% |
| 2025-08 | $136.8m | $106.4m | $22.2m | 20.90% |
| 2025-07 | $222.3m | $198.9m | $41.2m | 20.71% |
| 2025-06 | $283.3m | $257.4m | $53.3m | 20.72% |
| 2025-05 | $388.7m | $337.2m | $70.3m | 20.84% |
| 2025-04 | $628.7m | $555.5m | $117.6m | 21.18% |
| 2025-03 | $1.42bn | $1.18bn | $190.3m | 16.11% |
| 2025-02 | $2.65bn | $1.15bn | $80.1m | 6.97% |
| 2025-01 | $3.23bn | $0 | $0 | — |
| 2024-12 | $2.18bn | $0 | $0 | — |
| 2024-11 | $2.73bn | $0 | $0 | — |
| 2024-10 | $3.41bn | $9k | $2k | 25.00% |
| 2024-09 | $2.64bn | $0 | $0 | — |
| 2024-08 | $2.90bn | $0 | $0 | — |
| 2024-07 | $3.21bn | $0 | $0 | — |
8471.30.__.__ · What shipped · containers at 11 seaports
Everything below is about the six-digit heading 8471.30, and for a different reason than the receipts above. Those are counted at six digits because that is where the national count is published. These are counted at six digits because that is the only level at which ports, weights and origins exist at all. They are also different nets: the receipts count everything cleared nationwide, by sea, air and land; these count containers discharged at 11 seaports. Neither divides into the other.
| Origin | Share of weight | Tonnes | Unit value | Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vietnam | 57.72% | 32,920 | $150.93 | 12 |
| Thailand | 25.60% | 14,603 | $182.16 | 12 |
| China · this lookup | 10.29% | 5,868 | $74.44 | 12 |
| Indonesia | 2.91% | 1,662 | $93.74 | 12 |
| Taiwan | 2.08% | 1,186 | $101.37 | 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 0.54% | 307 | $17.86 | 12 |
| India | 0.41% | 236 | $103.79 | 12 |
| Japan | 0.30% | 170 | $49.85 | 12 |
| Malaysia | 0.06% | 34 | $54.78 | 12 |
| Netherlands | 0.04% | 23 | — | 10 |
| Hong Kong | 0.02% | 13 | — | 11 |
| Germany | 0.02% | 10 | — | 12 |
How to read: each row is one origin shipping this six-digit heading through the mirrored seaports, largest share of container weight first. Twelve months to May 2026. Share and tonnage are containerised weight through the 11 mirrored gateways. Unit value is the geometric mean of each month’s customs value per kilo — an average one enormous shipment cannot drag — value declared at the foreign port, over gross shipping weight including packing, so it is a statistic and not a quote. It is taken over observations above one tonne, so very small consignments — which tend to carry a higher value per kilo — are not in it. A dash means the twelve-month weight is too small for a unit value to mean anything.
Which 11 ports these are
| Port of unlading | Share of all containerised weight |
|---|---|
| Los Angeles, CA | 25.9% |
| Newark, NJ | 19.6% |
| Savannah, GA | 11.6% |
| Houston, TX | 10.4% |
| Long Beach, CA | 8.1% |
| Norfolk-Newport News, VA | 7.1% |
| Charleston, SC | 6.2% |
| Oakland, CA | 3.9% |
| Tacoma, WA | 3.0% |
| Seattle, WA | 2.1% |
| New York, NY | 2.0% |
Every port the ledger collects, by share of all containerised import weight recorded across it — the whole denominator behind “what shipped”, not a ranking and not a statement about any one code. Goods entering by air, across a land border, or through a port not on this list are in none of the trade figures on this page.
The goods under one heading do not have to agree. Where the rate side can say every line under a heading carries the same rate, this side can never say the same of the goods: a unit value that differs across origins is at least as likely to be a different product mix as a different price.
8471.30.__.__ · The lane over time
January 2024 1,537 t · May 2026
January 2024 $33.62/kg · May 2026
How to read: two strips through time — the upper is monthly container weight, the lower the typical declared price per kilo; each upright rule marks a month the required rate on 8471.30.01.00 from China changed — 8 changes in this window. Six-digit trade detail begins January 2024; the rate series does not run the whole width, so a stretch with no rule is not necessarily a stretch with no change. Weight and unit value are containerised, through the 11 mirrored gateways.
What this cannot tell you
The trade figures count containers discharged at 11 seaports. Goods arriving by air, across the land border, or through a smaller port are not in them — which is why the two dollar figures on this page are not two versions of one number.
The paid figure is a national average across every importer on that code and origin. Your own line can lawfully sit well away from it and still be right — an exclusion claimed, USMCA content, a quota line, goods returned under Chapter 98, a first-sale valuation. That is the whole reason the difference above is a difference and not a finding.
And a difference is not money owed. We pre-registered the test of whether this gap predicts recoverable duty and it failed — the result is on /limits, in full, with the sort that beat it.
Send one entry
You just looked up one code. An entry summary has forty of them, and the same two questions apply to every line on it.
Free. No account. We do not file with CBP and take no fee on anything you recover. Your file is read on our own server and is never sold or shared.
how a line is priced · the national number · what this does not do